Tothis end, anumber ofbenchmarks for measuring OOC performance have been recently introduced.

This model is trained on UCF101 with the same schedule as CoCLR for a fair comparison. We note a recent arXiv paper (MemDPC, to appear in ECCV2020 by Han et al.) has also used both RGB and optical We will add these discussions. We actually used the same augmentation as DPC in their released codebase. These are the core contributions of our paper. CoCLR-RGB model gets 70.2% by linear probing.

To this end, a number of benchmarks for measuring OOC performance have been recently introduced.

Several benchmarks have concluded that our best vision-language models (e.g., CLIP) are lacking in compositionality. Given an image, these benchmarks probe a model's ability to identify its associated caption amongst a set of compositional distractors. In response, a surge of recent proposals show improvements by finetuning CLIP with distractors as hard negatives. Our investigations reveal that these improvements have, in fact, been significantly overstated -- because existing benchmarks do not probe whether finetuned vision-language models remain invariant to hard positives. By curating an evaluation dataset with 112,382 hard negatives and hard positives, we uncover that including hard positives decreases CLIP's performance by 12.9%, while humans perform effortlessly at 99%. CLIP finetuned with hard negatives results in an even larger decrease, up to 38.7%. With this finding, we then produce a 1,775,259 image-text training set with both hard negative and hard positive captions. By training with both, we see improvements on existing benchmarks while simultaneously improving performance on hard positives, indicating a more robust improvement in compositionality. Our work suggests the need for future research to rigorously test and improve CLIP's understanding of semantic relationships between related "positive" concepts.

We propose Referral-Augmented Retrieval (RAR), a simple technique that concatenates document indices with referrals, i.e. text from other documents that cite or link to the given document, to provide significant performance gains for zero-shot information retrieval. The key insight behind our method is that referrals provide a more complete, multi-view representation of a document, much like incoming page links in algorithms like PageRank provide a comprehensive idea of a webpage's importance. RAR works with both sparse and dense retrievers, and outperforms generative text expansion techniques such as DocT5Query and Query2Doc a 37% and 21% absolute improvement on ACL paper retrieval Recall@10 -- while also eliminating expensive model training and inference. We also analyze different methods for multi-referral aggregation and show that RAR enables up-to-date information retrieval without re-training.